The 10 Most Common Causes of Air Leakage on Construction Projects

The 10 Most Common Causes of Air Leakage on Construction Projects (And How to Catch Them Early)

Key Takeaways

The same 10 details cause the vast majority of air leakage failures across Australian construction projects, regardless of building type.

Most of these leaks aren't caused by bad materials, they're caused by trade sequencing and unclear responsibility at junctions between trades.

Service, ceiling, and electrical penetrations are consistently the highest-frequency leak points because so many different trades pass through the same wall.

Catching these details at schematic design and during site audits is dramatically cheaper than finding them on final test day.

Every one of these 10 causes is preventable with the right detailing, sequencing, and a preliminary test before the formal AS/NZS ISO 9972 test.

Run enough blower door tests and a pattern shows up fast: it’s almost never the wall itself leaking. It’s the 10 places where something else, a pipe, a duct, a joint, a shaft, passes through it. These junctions get handed between trades, and air leakage is what happens in the gap between “someone else will seal that” and the final test. Here are the 10 details that cause the majority of air leakage failures on-site, and what to watch for on your next project.

Why Air Leakage Keeps Happening on the Same 10 Details

Every one of these points has one thing in common: two different trades meet at the same junction, and neither one owns the airtightness outcome.

The plumber isn’t thinking about the air barrier. Neither is the electrician, the mechanical contractor, or the façade installer. That’s not a workmanship problem; it’s a coordination problem, and it’s exactly why Aerotight runs project workshops before a single wall goes up.

1. Service Penetrations

Any pipe, cable, or service passing through the envelope creates a gap that has to be sealed on both sides, not just packed with insulation. Insulation stops heat transfer, it doesn’t stop air movement. This is one of the highest-frequency leak points on almost every project because there are simply so many of them.

2. Window and Door Interfaces

The window or door unit itself is rarely the problem, it’s the interface between the frame and the surrounding wall structure. Membrane laps, sealant continuity, and correct sequencing (does the membrane go over or under the frame flange?) all matter more than the product spec.

3. Façade Joints

Movement and expansion joints in the façade are designed to move, which makes them one of the hardest details to seal permanently. The wrong backing rod or sealant choice fails under thermal movement, reopening the leak path months after handover.

4. Roof-to-Wall Junctions

This junction sits at the intersection of two completely different air barrier systems, wall and roof, usually installed by two different trades on two different schedules. If the two systems aren’t detailed to physically lap and connect, there’s a continuous gap running the length of the building.

5. Lift Shafts

Lift shafts are notorious for air leakage because they’re often treated as a structural or fire problem, not an airtightness one. Shaft walls have multiple penetrations for controls, ventilation, and structural connections, and the shaft itself can act like a chimney, pulling air through any gap in the envelope around it.

6. Expansion Joints

Similar to façade joints but structural rather than cosmetic, expansion joints in slabs and walls need a sealing product rated to handle ongoing movement without cracking or separating. A static sealant in a dynamic joint is a leak waiting to happen.

7. Ceiling Penetrations

Downlights, sprinklers, exhaust fans, cable trays, HVAC diffusers: ceilings in commercial and residential builds alike are riddled with penetrations, and the ceiling plane is frequently treated as “not part of the envelope” when it absolutely is, especially in top-floor or single-storey applications.

8. Mechanical Ductwork

Ductwork passing through the envelope needs an airtight seal around the duct itself, separate from the duct’s own internal air-tightness rating. These are two different requirements and it’s a common mistake to assume a well-sealed duct system means a well-sealed penetration.

9. Electrical Penetrations

Conduits, cable trays, and switchboard penetrations are usually installed early and forgotten about by the time the airtightness detailing is being finalised. By final fit-out, these penetrations are often buried behind finishes, making them expensive to access and reseal if missed.

10. Fire-Stopping Interfaces

Fire-stopping and air-sealing aren’t automatically the same thing. A fire-rated penetration seal is tested for fire and smoke performance, not necessarily for air permeability, so this detail needs a product and installation method that satisfies both requirements at once, particularly in healthcare, high-rise, and life safety applications.

How to Stop These Leaks Before They Cost You a Failed Test

Catch Them at Schematic Design, Not on Test Day

Every one of these 10 causes is dramatically cheaper to fix on paper than on-site. Reviewing drawings and defining the air barrier line before construction starts, the second step in Aerotight’s process, catches most of these before a single penetration is cut.

Site Audits Catch What Drawings Can't

Drawings don’t account for what actually happens when six trades are on-site at once. Site audits during construction, carried out by qualified builders, catch the gap between the detail as drawn and the detail as installed, before it’s buried behind linings.

Frequently Asked Qiestions

What is the most common cause of air leakage in buildings?

Service penetrations, pipes, cables, and ducts passing through the envelope, are consistently the highest-frequency leak point, simply because there are so many of them on a typical project.

Can air leakage be fixed after construction is finished?

Yes, but it’s significantly more expensive once penetrations are buried behind finishes. Preliminary testing during construction identifies leaks while they’re still accessible.

Is fire-stopping the same as air sealing?

No. Fire-stopping products are rated for fire and smoke performance. Achieving both fire compliance and airtightness at the same penetration requires a detail and product suited to both.

Airtightness Compliance

The 10 Most Common Causes of Air Leakage on Construction Projects

Home The 10 Most Common Causes of Air Leakage on Construction Projects (And How to Catch Them Early) Key Takeaways The same 10 details cause ...
Read More →
Blower Door Test

Everything You Need to Know About Blower Door Test

Home What is a Blower Door Test?​ Written by Andrew Champness A Practical Guide for Architects, Engineers, and High-Performance Buildings A blower door test is ...
Read More →
Airtightness Compliance

Everything You Need to Know About AS 2252 in Australia​

Home Everything You Need to Know About AS 2252 in Australia​ A Practical Guide for Architects, Engineers, and Laboratory Projects​ When you’re designing or managing ...
Read More →

Get Expert Advice for Your Next Project

As energy costs rise and government projects demand measurable outcomes, airtightness has become a core performance metric.

Whether you are targeting NABERS ratings, Green Star certification, or standard NCC compliance, getting the details right at the design stage is non-negotiable.

Need airtightness testing for compliance or project verification? Submit the form and our team will reach out to you shortly.

Name(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Everything You Need to Know About AS 2252 in Australia​

  1. Home
  2. »
  3. Airtightness Compliance
  4. »
  5. Everything You Need to Know About AS 2252 in Australia​

Everything You Need to Know About AS 2252 in Australia​

A Practical Guide for Architects, Engineers, and Laboratory Projects​

When you’re designing or managing a laboratory, compliance isn’t just a box to tick. It directly affects safety, performance, and long-term operational risk.

That’s where AS 2252 comes in.

This Australian Standard governs how biological safety cabinets (BSCs) and clean workstations are designed, tested, installed, and maintained. And if you’re involved in healthcare, research, or pharmaceutical environments, it’s something you simply can’t afford to misunderstand.

Let’s walk through what actually matters, without the unnecessary complexity.

What is AS 2252?​

AS 2252 is a series of Australian Standards that ensures biological safety cabinets perform as intended in real-world conditions.

The AS 2252 Framework:

  • AS 2252.1:2025 (Class I): Focuses on personnel and environmental protection.
  • AS 2252.2:2025 (Class II): The “Gold Standard” for modern labs. Provides personnel, environment, and product (sample) protection.
  • AS 2252.4: Technical guidelines for installation and use (critical for Architects).
  • AS 2252.5: Requirements for Cytotoxic Drug Safety Cabinets (specialised for oncology/pharmacy).

Their role is straightforward but essential:

Protect people, the environment, and sensitive materials from contamination or exposure

Why AS 2252 Matters More Than You Think

On paper, a biological safety cabinet might look compliant. But in practice, performance depends on:

  • Airflow stability
  • Installation conditions
  • Room environment
  • Ongoing maintenance

This is why AS 2252 doesn’t just focus on design. It ensures the cabinet actually works once it’s installed and in use.

For technical teams, this is where projects either pass smoothly or run into costly delays.

How Biological Safety Cabinets Actually Work

To meet AS 2252 requirements, cabinets rely on a combination of:

HEPA Filtration

Removes 99.97% of airborne particles, including harmful microorganisms.

Controlled Airflow

Prevents contaminated air from escaping or entering the work zone.

Pressure Management

Maintains safe containment through negative and positive pressure zones.

These systems work together to deliver three critical outcomes:

  • Personnel protection
  • Environmental protection
  • Product protection

If one fails, the entire system is compromised.

The Compliance Pathways: Testing vs. Verification

To prove that a building meets the mandated 5 m3/(h·m2) threshold, designers must choose one of two compliance routes:

1. The Verification Method (JV4) – The Blower Door Test

This is the most robust way to ensure compliance and is increasingly preferred for complex designs.

  • The Standard: Testing must be conducted strictly in accordance with AS/NZS ISO 9972.
  • The Process: Large, calibrated fans are mounted in a main doorway to pressurize and depressurize the entire building (or representative zones).
  • The Benefit: A successful JV4 test provides definitive performance data. This often allows designers to use holistic energy modeling to offset other design elements (like standard-performance glazing) with the building’s superior airtightness.

2. The DTS Pathway – Evidence of Suitability

If a formal blower door test is not conducted, the builder must provide comprehensive “Evidence of suitability” to the building certifier.

This requires a rigorous inspection and documentation regime throughout construction, proving that every prescriptive requirement of Part J5D7 has been met and that all fabric junctions are continuously sealed.

This requires meticulous documentation of prescriptive sealing measures, including:

  • Windows and Doors: Durable seals (brush or bulb) to the head, jambs, and sills.
  • Fabric Junctions: Continuous sealing of connections between roofs, walls, and floors using membranes or tapes.
  • Openings: Self-closing dampers on exhaust fans and close-fitting flaps on chimneys.

Beyond the Envelope: Mechanical Systems and Windows

Airtightness doesn’t stop at the walls. NCC 2022 Section J also emphasizes two often-overlooked areas:

  • Part J6 Mechanical Air Systems: HVAC ductwork must be sealed to prevent leakage, complying with AS 4254. Poor duct sealing can undermine an otherwise airtight building.
  • Internal Window Performance: Even with a compliant envelope, windows remain thermal weak points. High-performance window furnishings—such as honeycomb (cellular) blinds or thermal-lined curtains—act as a secondary layer to minimize solar gain and support the building’s overall thermal strategy.

Typical Airtightness Benchmarks

Across Australia, common targets include:

  • Standard commercial: 10–15 ACH@50Pa
  • High-performance buildings: 5–10 ACH@50Pa
  • Net Zero / Passive House: <5 ACH@50Pa

The tighter the building, the lower the energy demand and the easier compliance becomes.

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Waiting until the end of a project to address airtightness is a high-risk strategy. If a building fails a JV4 test after internal linings are installed, rectifying leaks is cost-prohibitive.

Strategies for Success:

  • The “Red Line” Rule: Architects should draw a continuous air barrier on all sections. This line must be constructible and durable.
  • Early Coordination: Ensure electrical, plumbing, and service penetrations are sealed as they are installed, rather than patched at the end.
  • Accurate HVAC Sizing: An airtight building allows engineers to size mechanical plants more accurately, preventing the need for oversized, inefficient equipment.

Work With Specialists Who Understand Performance

At Aerotight, we work alongside architects, builders, and developers to deliver customised window furnishing solutions that actively support energy efficiency outcomes.

We don’t just supply blinds or curtains—we help improve:

  • Thermal performance
  • Occupant comfort
  • Overall building efficiency

Particularly for projects targeting:

  • NCC 2022 compliance
  • NABERS ratings
    High-performance residential and commercial builds
Airtightness Compliance

The 10 Most Common Causes of Air Leakage on Construction Projects

Home The 10 Most Common Causes of Air Leakage on Construction Projects (And How to Catch Them Early) Key Takeaways The same 10 details cause ...
Read More →
Blower Door Test

Everything You Need to Know About Blower Door Test

Home What is a Blower Door Test?​ Written by Andrew Champness A Practical Guide for Architects, Engineers, and High-Performance Buildings A blower door test is ...
Read More →
Airtightness Compliance

Everything You Need to Know About AS 2252 in Australia​

Home Everything You Need to Know About AS 2252 in Australia​ A Practical Guide for Architects, Engineers, and Laboratory Projects​ When you’re designing or managing ...
Read More →

Get Expert Advice for Your Next Project

As energy costs rise and government projects demand measurable outcomes, airtightness has become a core performance metric.

Whether you are targeting NABERS ratings, Green Star certification, or standard NCC compliance, getting the details right at the design stage is non-negotiable.

Need airtightness testing for compliance or project verification? Submit the form and our team will reach out to you shortly.

Name(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Everything You Need to Know About ISO 14644

  1. Home
  2. »
  3. Airtightness Compliance
  4. »
  5. Everything You Need to Know About ISO 14644

Everything You Need to Know About ISO 14644

A Practical Guide for Architects, Engineers, and Cleanroom Projects in Australia

From high-tech manufacturing to sterile pharmaceutical hubs, the integrity of a controlled environment hinges on ISO 14644 compliance. For Australian architects and engineers, designing to these standards is not just about particle counts – it is about risk mitigation, structural performance, and meeting stringent NATA and TGA requirements.

This guide breaks down the technical nuances of the ISO 14644 framework to ensure your next project is certified, compliant, and high-performing.

What Is ISO 14644 and Why It Matters in Australia

ISO 14644 is the international benchmark for cleanroom classification, testing, and operation. It defines how clean the air must be based on particle concentration. In Australia, ISO 14644 is widely used across:
  • Pharmaceutical and biotech facilities
  • Hospitals and operating theatres
  • Semiconductor and precision manufacturing
  • Research laboratories and universities
It also works alongside standards like:
  • AS 2252 (cleanroom construction and performance)
  • NCC (National Construction Code)
  • GMP guidelines for pharmaceutical environments.
In practice, ISO 14644 is what engineers use to measure performance, while AS 2252 helps guide how to build it.

Understanding ISO Cleanroom Classifications

Cleanrooms are classified based on maximum allowable airborne particles per cubic metre.

ISO Classes at a Glance

The lower the number, the cleaner the air.

ISO Class

Cleanliness Level

Typical Applications

ISO 5

Ultra-clean

Aseptic filling, critical pharma

ISO 6

Very clean

Medical devices, biotech

ISO 7

Controlled

Operating theatres, labs

ISO 8

Basic control

General manufacturing

The ISO 14644 Series (What You Actually Need to Know)

ISO 14644 isn’t one document. It’s a system.

Understanding ISO 14644-1: The Foundation of Air Cleanliness

Defines particle limits and ISO class levels. This is where “ISO 7 cleanroom” comes from.

At the core of any controlled environment project is ISO 14644-1. This part defines the classification of air cleanliness by particle concentration. For engineering specifications, it is critical to define the target ISO Class (1 through 9) based on the specific sensitivity of the facility.

The ISO Classification Formula

To calculate the maximum permitted concentration Cn for a specific particle size, engineers refer to the following relationship: C n = 10 N × ( 0.1 D ) 2.08

Where:

  • Cn is the maximum permitted concentration (particles/m3.
  • N is the ISO Class number.
  • D is the particle size in micrometers (µm).

Defining Occupancy States for Technical Specifications

A common pitfall in cleanroom tenders is failing to specify the occupancy state. Per ISO 14644, performance must be verified at three distinct stages:

  1. As-built: The installation is complete with all services functioning, but no equipment or personnel are present.
  2. At-rest: The facility is complete and equipment is installed and operating, but no personnel are present.
  3. Operational: The facility is functioning in its normal specified mode with the specified number of personnel present and working.

Pro Tip: In the Australian market, ensuring as-built airtightness is a prerequisite for achieving operational ISO 14644 targets efficiently.

ISO 14644-2 – Monitoring

Outlines how to maintain compliance over time. Not a one-off test. Ongoing verification is required.

ISO 14644-3: Testing and Validation Methods

To achieve NATA accredited cleanroom testing in NSW, VIC, or QLD, the facility must undergo rigorous validation including:

  • Airflow Visualization (Smoke Testing): To confirm laminar or turbulent flow patterns.
  • Filter Leak Testing: Ensuring HEPA/ULPA integrity.
  • Recovery Tests: Measuring how quickly the room returns to its specified cleanliness level after a contamination event.

ISO 14644-4: Design and Construction

This section is the “blueprint” for architects. It covers the physical requirements of the envelope, including material selection, airlock configurations, and the integration of HVAC systems.

In Australia, this must often align with NCC 2022/2025 Section J requirements for energy efficiency and thermal performance.

ISO 14644-5: Operations

Focuses on:

  • Cleaning protocols
  • Staff behaviour
  • Maintenance

Even a perfectly designed cleanroom fails with poor operation.

Key Design Considerations for Architects and Engineers

If you’re specifying or designing a cleanroom in Australia, these are non-negotiables:

Airflow Strategy

• Laminar vs turbulent flow
• Ceiling HEPA coverage
• Return air pathways

Airflow is the backbone of contamination control.

Air Changes Per Hour (ACH)

Typical ranges:
• ISO 7: 30–60 ACH
• ISO 5: up to 240+ ACH

Higher ACH means better dilution of contaminants, but also higher energy costs.

Filtration Systems

Typical ranges:
• HEPA (99.97% efficiency at 0.3 µm)
• ULPA (higher efficiency for critical zones)

Pressure Differentials

Typical ranges:
• Positive pressure prevents contamination ingress
• Pressure cascades between zones are critical

Material Selection

Typical ranges:
• Non-shedding surfaces
• Easy-to-clean finishes
• Airtight construction

Engineering Airflow Dynamics: Laminar vs. Turbulent Flow

The choice of airflow pattern is the primary driver of the HVAC design and the eventual ISO classification.

  • Unidirectional (Laminar) Flow: Essential for ISO Class 5 and cleaner. Air moves in a single direction at a uniform velocity (typically 0.45 m/s ± 20%) to “sweep” particles away from the work zone.
  • Non-unidirectional (Turbulent) Flow: Common for ISO Class 6 to 9. Air is introduced via ceiling diffusers and mixed with room air to dilute contaminants.

Why Local Compliance Matters: NATA, TGA, and Australian Standards

Building a cleanroom in Australia requires more than just following international ISO standards. Local regulatory bodies like the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) have specific annexes for medicinal products, while NATA provides the accreditation for the testing agencies that sign off on your build.

Key SEO Keywords for Australian Projects:

  • Cleanroom standards Australia
  • TGA compliance cleanroom design
  • NATA accredited cleanroom testing services NSW/VIC/QLD
  • ISO 14644 monitoring plans engineering consultants
  • Pharmaceutical manufacturing cleanroom guidelines Australia
Airtightness Compliance

The 10 Most Common Causes of Air Leakage on Construction Projects

Home The 10 Most Common Causes of Air Leakage on Construction Projects (And How to Catch Them Early) Key Takeaways The same 10 details cause ...
Read More →
Blower Door Test

Everything You Need to Know About Blower Door Test

Home What is a Blower Door Test?​ Written by Andrew Champness A Practical Guide for Architects, Engineers, and High-Performance Buildings A blower door test is ...
Read More →
Airtightness Compliance

Everything You Need to Know About AS 2252 in Australia​

Home Everything You Need to Know About AS 2252 in Australia​ A Practical Guide for Architects, Engineers, and Laboratory Projects​ When you’re designing or managing ...
Read More →

Get Expert Advice for Your Next Project

As energy costs rise and government projects demand measurable outcomes, airtightness has become a core performance metric.

Whether you are targeting NABERS ratings, Green Star certification, or standard NCC compliance, getting the details right at the design stage is non-negotiable.

Need airtightness testing for compliance or project verification? Submit the form and our team will reach out to you shortly.

Name(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Everything You Need to Know About NCC 2022 Section J Airtightness Mandates

Everything You Need to Know About NCC 2022 Section J Airtightness Mandates

A Practical Guide for Architects, Engineers, and High-Performance Buildings

The introduction of NCC 2022 marks the most significant change to Australian building energy efficiency standards in over a decade. For architects, engineers, and building professionals working on Class 2-9 commercial buildings, the updates to Section J (Volume One) introduce rigorous, quantifiable requirements for building envelope integrity.

Airtightness is no longer just “good practice” – it is now a mandatory performance requirement with clear compliance pathways. This blog post breaks down exactly what you need to know about the new mandates and how they impact your design and documentation process.
This guide breaks down the technical nuances of the ISO 14644 framework to ensure your next project is certified, compliant, and high-performing.

Why Airtightness Is Now Critical Under NCC 2022

The National Construction Code (NCC) 2022 Section J has fundamentally shifted how energy efficiency is achieved in Australian buildings.

It is no longer enough to rely on insulation alone.

Uncontrolled air leakage is now one of the biggest threats to compliance.

For architects, engineers, and developers, this means:

  • Higher performance expectations
  • Greater scrutiny on building envelopes
  • Increased reliance on airtightness strategies and validation

If your building leaks air, it leaks energy and that directly impacts your ability to meet NCC compliance.

The New Focus: Part J1P1 and Controlling Infiltration

The primary objective of Section J remains reducing operational energy consumption. However, NCC 2022 recognizes that air leakage (infiltration) is a massive source of thermal loss in Australian commercial buildings. Under Part J1P1 (Performance Requirement), the building envelope must now be constructed to be “appropriately airtight.” This is defined by a mandatory air permeability rate:
  • Maximum 5 m3/(h·m2) at 50 Pa reference pressure.
This metric quantifies the amount of air escaping through the building envelope per hour, normalized by the surface area of the envelope. Meeting this target is essential for reducing the energy required for both heating and cooling.

Deemed-to-Satisfy Sealing Requirements (J5D7)

Before physical testing is even considered, the DTS pathway specifies non-negotiable construction details that must be implemented during the build process. These are the prescriptive measures detailed in Part J5D7:

  • Windows and Doors: Must be fitted with durable seals to the head, jambs, and sills (brush or bulb seals).
  • Chimneys and Flues: Must include close-fitting dampers or flaps.
  • Exhaust Fans: Must be fitted with self-closing dampers.
  • Fabric Junctions: All connections between roofs, walls, and floors – plus all penetrations for services (pipes, cables, ducts) – must be meticulously sealed using membranes, tapes, or durable sealants.

The Compliance Pathways: Testing vs. Verification

To prove that a building meets the mandated 5 m3/(h·m2) threshold, designers must choose one of two compliance routes:

1. The Verification Method (JV4) – The Blower Door Test

This is the most robust way to ensure compliance and is increasingly preferred for complex designs.

  • The Standard: Testing must be conducted strictly in accordance with AS/NZS ISO 9972.
  • The Process: Large, calibrated fans are mounted in a main doorway to pressurize and depressurize the entire building (or representative zones).
  • The Benefit: A successful JV4 test provides definitive performance data. This often allows designers to use holistic energy modeling to offset other design elements (like standard-performance glazing) with the building’s superior airtightness.

2. The DTS Pathway – Evidence of Suitability

If a formal blower door test is not conducted, the builder must provide comprehensive “Evidence of suitability” to the building certifier.

This requires a rigorous inspection and documentation regime throughout construction, proving that every prescriptive requirement of Part J5D7 has been met and that all fabric junctions are continuously sealed.

This requires meticulous documentation of prescriptive sealing measures, including:

  • Windows and Doors: Durable seals (brush or bulb) to the head, jambs, and sills.
  • Fabric Junctions: Continuous sealing of connections between roofs, walls, and floors using membranes or tapes.
  • Openings: Self-closing dampers on exhaust fans and close-fitting flaps on chimneys.

Beyond the Envelope: Mechanical Systems and Windows

Airtightness doesn’t stop at the walls. NCC 2022 Section J also emphasizes two often-overlooked areas:

  • Part J6 Mechanical Air Systems: HVAC ductwork must be sealed to prevent leakage, complying with AS 4254. Poor duct sealing can undermine an otherwise airtight building.
  • Internal Window Performance: Even with a compliant envelope, windows remain thermal weak points. High-performance window furnishings—such as honeycomb (cellular) blinds or thermal-lined curtains—act as a secondary layer to minimize solar gain and support the building’s overall thermal strategy.

Typical Airtightness Benchmarks

Across Australia, common targets include:

  • Standard commercial: 10–15 ACH@50Pa
  • High-performance buildings: 5–10 ACH@50Pa
  • Net Zero / Passive House: <5 ACH@50Pa

The tighter the building, the lower the energy demand and the easier compliance becomes.

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Waiting until the end of a project to address airtightness is a high-risk strategy. If a building fails a JV4 test after internal linings are installed, rectifying leaks is cost-prohibitive.

Strategies for Success:

  • The “Red Line” Rule: Architects should draw a continuous air barrier on all sections. This line must be constructible and durable.
  • Early Coordination: Ensure electrical, plumbing, and service penetrations are sealed as they are installed, rather than patched at the end.
  • Accurate HVAC Sizing: An airtight building allows engineers to size mechanical plants more accurately, preventing the need for oversized, inefficient equipment.

Work With Specialists Who Understand Performance

At Aerotight, we work alongside architects, builders, and developers to deliver customised window furnishing solutions that actively support energy efficiency outcomes.

We don’t just supply blinds or curtains—we help improve:

  • Thermal performance
  • Occupant comfort
  • Overall building efficiency

Particularly for projects targeting:

  • NCC 2022 compliance
  • NABERS ratings
    High-performance residential and commercial builds
Airtightness Compliance

The 10 Most Common Causes of Air Leakage on Construction Projects

Home The 10 Most Common Causes of Air Leakage on Construction Projects (And How to Catch Them Early) Key Takeaways The same 10 details cause ...
Read More →
Blower Door Test

Everything You Need to Know About Blower Door Test

Home What is a Blower Door Test?​ Written by Andrew Champness A Practical Guide for Architects, Engineers, and High-Performance Buildings A blower door test is ...
Read More →
Airtightness Compliance

Everything You Need to Know About AS 2252 in Australia​

Home Everything You Need to Know About AS 2252 in Australia​ A Practical Guide for Architects, Engineers, and Laboratory Projects​ When you’re designing or managing ...
Read More →

Get Expert Advice for Your Next Project

As energy costs rise and government projects demand measurable outcomes, airtightness has become a core performance metric.

Whether you are targeting NABERS ratings, Green Star certification, or standard NCC compliance, getting the details right at the design stage is non-negotiable.

Need airtightness testing for compliance or project verification? Submit the form and our team will reach out to you shortly.

Name(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.